Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 15, 2014, 11:52 pm

Updated Topics | Recent Unread Topics
Home Help Search Login Register

  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 124
1  Forum / Sanctum Sanctorum / Re: Charts and Graphs thread on: September 14, 2014, 12:05 am


These guys also don't count the 38 from the missile, and I don't think they should. That puts it at 12.9 per film by Roger Moore though.
2  Forum / Dumbtown / Re: THE PRESIDENT OF VICE on: September 13, 2014, 11:16 pm
3  Forum / Dumbtown / Re: Random pictures on: September 13, 2014, 01:39 am
4  Forum / Science! and Sports / Re: The NHL 2014-2015 Hockey Thread on: September 11, 2014, 08:35 pm
New rules!

Rule 1.8 – Rink – Goalkeeper’s Restricted Area

The trapezoid will be expanded by two feet from the goal post on both sides
of the net.
More goalie puck play allowed!

Rule 23 – Game Misconduct Penalties

A new Game Misconduct category will be created. Clipping, charging,
elbowing, interference, kneeing, head-butting and butt-ending move from the
general category into the same category as boarding and checking from
behind (“Physical Fouls”), whereby a player who incurs two such game
misconducts in this category would now be automatically suspended for one
Looks good for a lot of that dangerous stuff, but interference seems out of place there.

Rule 24 – Penalty Shot

The ‘Spin-O-Rama’ move, as described in Section 24.2 of the 2013-14 NHL
Rule Book, will no longer be permitted either in Penalty Shot situations or
in the Shootout.
Skating backwards was always illegal but spin-o-rama shots were allowed, now they aren't, idk, shootouts are dumb. I guess it will probably make them last longer though because a spin-o-rama is a very successful shot.

Rule 38 – Video Goal Judge

Video review will be expanded in the following areas:

* Rule 38.4 (viii) has been modified to allow broader discretion to Hockey
Operations to assist the referees in determining the legitimacy of all
potential goals (e.g., to ensure they are “good hockey goals”). The
revised Rule will allow Hockey Operations to correct a broader array of
situations where video review clearly establishes that a “goal” or “no
goal” call on the ice has been made in error. The new expanded rule will
also allow Hockey Operations to provide guidance to referees on goal and
potential goal plays where the referee has blown his whistle (or intended
to blow his whistle) after having lost sight of the puck.

* In reviewing “Kicked in Goals,” Hockey Operations will require more
demonstrable video evidence of a “distinct kicking motion” in order to
overrule a “goal” call on the ice, or to uphold a “no goal” call on the
More reviewing goals is fine, I don't want good goals to not be called good goals or for bad goals to be called good goals.

Rule 57 – Tripping

The rule relating to “Tripping” will be revised to specifically provide
that a two minute minor penalty will be assessed when a defending player
“dives” and trips an attacking player with his body/arm/shoulder,
regardless of whether the defending player is able to make initial contact
with the puck.

But, in situations where a penalty shot might otherwise be appropriate, if
the defending player “dives” and touches the puck first (before the trip),
no penalty shot will be awarded. (In such cases, the resulting penalty will
be limited to a two-minute minor penalty for tripping.)
Canucks Fucked.

Rule 64 – Diving / Embellishment

The supplementary discipline penalties associated with Rule 64.3
(Diving/Embellishment) will be revised to bring attention to and more
seriously penalize players (and teams) who repeatedly dive and embellish in
an attempt to draw penalties. Fines will be assessed to players and head
coaches on a graduated scale outlined below.

Incident # Player Fine(s) Head Coach Fine(s)
1 Warning N/A
2 $2,000 N/A
3 $3,000 N/A
4 $4,000 $2,000
5 $5,000 $3,000
6 $5,000 $4,000
7 $5,000 $5,000
8 $5,000 $5,000
LOL Bruins, Penguins, Canucks, Habs. You guys are all getting some fines, so are your head coaches.

Rule 76 – Face-offs

To curb delay tactics on face-offs after icing infractions, in situations
where the defending team is guilty of a face-off violation, following an
icing, the defending player who is initially lined up for the face-off will
be given a warning, but will be required to remain in the circle to take
the face-off. A second face-off violation by the defending team in such
situation will result in a two minute minor bench penalty.
Wow, this is huge, icing is going to be as it's intended to be now, no more going through 7 faceoff fuckups to rest your team, icing now has teeth again. This is going to result in a lot of goals against tired low-discipline defense teams. I'm not really worried about the Avs despite that because they never really did the getting tossed out of the faceoff to rest shenanigans.

Rule 84 – Overtime

* Teams will switch ends prior to the start of overtime in the regular
* The entire ice surface will undergo a “dry scrape” prior to the start of
overtime in the regular season.
* The procedure requiring the head coach to submit a list of the first
three shooters in the shoot-out has been eliminated.
Better ice surface for the shootout and the coach can make last minute shootout decisions.

Rule 85 – Puck Out of Bounds

There have been further rule changes made relating to face-off location to
avoid penalizing teams for plays intended to create bona fide scoring
opportunities. Specifically, the following are “categories of plays” where
face-offs will remain in the attacking zone despite the fact that the
attacking team was technically responsible for the stoppage in play: Shots
at the net by a player on the attacking team where: (i) the shot breaks
the glass; (ii) the shot goes off the side of the net and deflects out of
play; (iii) the shot goes off the dasher boards or glass and deflects out
of play; (iv) the shot is tipped or deflected out of play by a teammate;
and (v) the shot becomes wedged in or on the exterior of the goal net.
Offense can stay offensive in offensive zone for some stoppages that suck to be taken out of the offensive zone afterwards.

Rule 1.9 – Rink – Face-off Spots and Circles – Ice Markings/Hash Marks

The hash marks at the end zone circles will be moved from three feet apart
to five feet, seven inches apart (international markings).
Enforcers gotta take an extra step to fight on faceoff fights, much less of a physical scrum on the faceoffs.
5  Forum / Sanctum Sanctorum / Re: So Scotland may very well leave the UK in 10 days on: September 11, 2014, 06:13 pm
6  Forum / Sanctum Sanctorum / Re: So Scotland may very well leave the UK in 10 days on: September 09, 2014, 01:09 pm
David Cameron has announced he will be going to Scotland tomorrow to convince them not to leave the UK.

He might be overestimating how charismatic he is.
7  Forum / Dumbtown / Re: Random pictures on: September 08, 2014, 08:18 pm
8  Forum / Sanctum Sanctorum / Re: So Scotland may very well leave the UK in 10 days on: September 08, 2014, 05:43 pm
YouGov's polls have, of all the pollsters, until now always returned the largest No margins. I wonder if they changed their methodology or something.

YouGov polls only get people who pay attention to politics, own a computer, and use it over a certain number of hours a week, which skews them towards No based on sampling, they then try to fix that with a weighting procedure, which they seem to have only begun implementing a few weeks back.

The YouGov sample tends to be richer than average, more likely to have been born outside of Scotland than average, and has very few people under 30. As of a few weeks ago they implemented a weighting formula to weight their polling sample to be more like what the expected average voter is.

If they do the weighting properly, their survey methodology more effectively shows changing opinions in response to happenings, but can cause errors due to their survey sample progressively becoming more politically conscious. They did get close in the US 2012 presidential election, but this sort of survey methodology is new and has more possibilities for errors as well as more information about what is happening if they do it right.
9  Forum / Sanctum Sanctorum / Re: So Scotland may very well leave the UK in 10 days on: September 08, 2014, 02:46 pm
I see that a YouGov poll has Yes at 3 point lead, here's some cross tabs.

I didn't realize 16+ can vote on this, I had assumed you guys were 18+ as well, that said the cross-tabs would lead me to think that there's going to be a slight No victory unless there's a strong Yes push among the current "don't know" and "no intention to vote" crowd, as younger voters, men, and lower social grade voters tend to have lower turnout. If Yes wins, it's only going to be by there being a large turnout.
10  Forum / Sanctum Sanctorum / Re: So Scotland may very well leave the UK in 10 days on: September 08, 2014, 02:05 pm
Then it sounds like it would be a good fit with the post-Scotland-independence UKIP England.
11  Forum / Sanctum Sanctorum / Re: So Scotland may very well leave the UK in 10 days on: September 08, 2014, 01:46 pm

I like this one best. Go with that one, UK, should Scotland dump you.
12  Forum / Sanctum Sanctorum / Re: So Scotland may very well leave the UK in 10 days on: September 08, 2014, 12:55 pm
What will the UK do about their flag?
13  Forum / Sanctum Sanctorum / Re: Charts and Graphs thread on: September 08, 2014, 12:07 pm

Good news adult baby diaper lovers!
14  Forum / Sanctum Sanctorum / Re: So Scotland may very well leave the UK in 10 days on: September 07, 2014, 08:33 pm
If Scotland goes independent, don't form an alliance with France, as that didn't work out well last time.
15  Forum / Sanctum Sanctorum / Re: So Scotland may very well leave the UK in 10 days on: September 07, 2014, 03:26 pm
Pretty much, there's so much smoke and disinformation being blown around from all sides that it's clear that nobody's got a clue. It's all very exciting, it'll be like starting a new Dwarf Fortress.
I recommend bringing an anvil, I know you don't need one because you can usually trade the first fall, but I find it a whole lot easier to trade for more seeds and stuff and just take the anvil to start with.
16  Forum / Dumbtown / Re: nerds fucking suck on: September 07, 2014, 03:12 am
To sum up Not a Spatula's post, Zoe Quinn is computer literate enough to find an IRC room where planning of her harassment was done, she idled in there and kept some logs, her exboyfriend organized some stuff and answered questions about himself and her to prove his identity. The irc channel was in rizon, our old server, which lists your IP when you log on and log off unless you set up a custom netmask. She's been in there for weeks collecting logs and taking screencaps, then sending those on to the police. For some of the people organizing harassment, she has collected their IP address and their plans and passed them onto the police. At the very least, her exboyfriend who started a lot of it and helped organize the harassment had to prove his identity to the satisfaction of the IRC room, so there is a chance that the organized harassment campaign could have consequences for some of the people doing the harassment.
17  Forum / Sanctum Sanctorum / Re: Charts and Graphs thread on: September 07, 2014, 02:34 am

Daniel Craig: the drinkenist Bond.
18  Forum / Linkies / Re: Madden GIFerator on: September 06, 2014, 12:35 am
19  Forum / Sanctum Sanctorum / Re: Charts and Graphs thread on: September 05, 2014, 07:13 pm
20  Forum / General Discussion / Re: The Chatlog Thread on: September 05, 2014, 05:42 pm
[03:41.46] <+laktose> is it weird that i have a huge crush on amy poehler
[03:41.48] <+laktose> is that bad
[03:41.56] <%BSam> knope
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 124

Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!